History separates our president from his crown. I gossip not of the firmness of office to lacerate and inflame its citizenry Instead it is the crown which represents the adornment of precious metals by leaders..
The Power of Jewelry
History separates our president from his crown I prate not of the tenacity of office to rip and flame its citizenry Instead it is the crown which represents the frill of precious metals by leaders of the mature globe Once, jewelry was the ornamental expression of tenacity Ancient Egyptians were experts at gold moulding and jewelry ornament often expressing some lessee of their belief practice The Pharaohs would bury themselves with gold in edict to enter the later life wealthily The Greeks adorned jewelry as an digit of greatness insisting on massive pieces thicken with gemstones Kings and Queens throughout the chronicle Europe own worn crowns, maybe the most recognizable symbol of strength as produced by goldsmiths and jewelry makers.
Along the style the powers that be keep traded in their crowns for suits and thrones for bullet unaffected limousines Jewelry has been regulated to personal spell of manner and not necessarily a quantity of tenacity Crowns can be practical at a school artifice or museum when they once necessary anyone intimate enough to sink to his/her knees and peck the hand of the ever loving break Other than military garments there are halfway no symbols of jewelry as an interval of fastness in developed civilizations. This mend is due primarily to democratization of government in the west Long ago the cycle of strength remained within the confines of blood relatives. Then, the arrogance of tightness was outwardly displayed with crowns of gold, robes studded with glittering stones and ladylike rings jell with precious metals
Fear of losing ones position of firmness has diminished the showing of excess. The first politician to declare up in a crown and robe commit surely be tossed from office after a duly extended title of irony The expectation today is the more politically mighty one is the less showy one should be There is a difference, of course, between the substance of true force and the tenacity of money Those with legitimate force make act and authorize wars. Purely wealthy people, like those in the amusement field, are culturally influential and can be experimental sporting the fashionable in Cartier watches fitted with obscenely expensive diamonds without trepidation of repercussion Musicians, actresses and sports stars gallivant about with stones dangling from their ears, necks and wrists They are not, of course, explicable in the equivalent ways as the policy makers. They are judged largely by their performances and as artists expected to be stylish, including the ornament of jewels.
Yet, why are the policymakers not allowed to be stylishly expressive If his business is noted does it problem that Mr Senator is wearing the voguish in diamond knops earrings What about a crown? Why should the president be chastised for wearing one? It should only weight the grandeur that is the presidency. The vice president can carry a gold bastinado and paddock the pave before talking In fact, many other kinsfolk might be fresh interested in politics if senators and congressman dressed fresh stylishly and wore further ritualistic jewelry We can admire our leaders for what they retain always been All laud the president king.